ChatGPT vs Google Bard: Which is Better?

Introduction

The world of artificial intelligence has witnessed significant advancements in natural language processing, and Google has been at the forefront of this innovation. Two prominent language models developed by Google have gained attention: ChatGPT and Bard.

In this blog, we will explore the features, capabilities, and potential applications of these two AI-driven systems to understand their unique strengths and differences. Is ChatGPT better than Google Bard, or is it the other way around?
Let’s find out!

ChatGPT: The Conversational Language Model

ChatGPT is an extension of OpenAI’s GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) technology, which Google has licensed to develop its own variant. Powered by GPT’s vast language model, ChatGPT is designed to engage in natural language conversations with users.

This interactive AI tool can understand context, generate text, and provide insightful responses to queries. Users find ChatGPT useful for a wide range of applications, from content drafting and creative writing to answering questions and offering suggestions.

Strengths of ChatGPT

• Natural and conversational: ChatGPT excels at holding engaging and human-like conversations, making it a valuable tool for chatbots and virtual assistants.
• Versatile: Its open-ended nature allows users to explore various topics and receive relevant responses.
• Easy to use: With a user-friendly interface, ChatGPT requires minimal technical expertise, making it accessible to a broader audience.

Bard: Google’s Multimodal AI Model

Bard represents Google’s foray into multimodal AI, combining advanced language understanding with visual comprehension. Unlike traditional language models that only work with text, Bard can interpret and generate content using both text and images. This capability opens up new possibilities for content creation, visual storytelling, and understanding complex datasets.

Strengths of Bard

• Multimodal understanding: Bard’s ability to process both textual and visual information makes it adept at tasks that require analyzing image-text pairs.
• Enhanced content generation: The incorporation of visual data enables Bard to create more contextually relevant and engaging content.
• Improved comprehension: The multimodal approach empowers Bard to comprehend and process complex information with greater accuracy.

Differences between ChatGPT and Bard

While both ChatGPT and Bard are language models developed by Google, they serve distinct purposes. ChatGPT focuses on natural language understanding and conversation, while Bard extends this capability by integrating visual information, enabling it to process and generate multimodal content.

The primary differences are:

• Input Modality: ChatGPT solely processes text-based input, while Bard can handle both text and images.
• Use Cases: ChatGPT is ideal for chat-based applications, content creation, and text-based tasks, while Bard shines in image-text tasks, visual storytelling, and data comprehension.
• Potential Applications

ChatGPT Applications

• Virtual Assistants: Powering chatbots and virtual assistants to interact more naturally with users.
• Content Drafting: Assisting writers in generating creative content or brainstorming ideas.
• Customer Support: Providing instant and helpful responses to customer queries.

Bard Applications

• Visual Storytelling: Enhancing content creation by integrating text and images for richer narratives.
• Data Analysis: Extracting insights from multimodal datasets, such as social media posts with accompanying images.
• Image-Text Generation: Generating creative captions or descriptions for images.

OpenAI In Trouble

According to a recent lawsuit filed in the Northern District of California, OpenAI, the AI firm responsible for ChatGPT and other products, is accused of transitioning from a non-profit research lab to unlawfully stealing and using millions of users’ private information to train its tools. The 157-page lawsuit alleges that OpenAI acquired “stolen private information, including personally identifiable information,” from hundreds of millions of internet users.

The lawsuit, brought forth by individuals identified by initials, professions, or their interactions with OpenAI’s tools, goes so far as to claim that OpenAI poses a “potentially catastrophic risk to humanity.” The suit accuses OpenAI of prioritising profit over privacy, security, and ethics, alleging that the company secretly harvested vast amounts of personal data from the internet without obtaining permission or notifying the owners.

The stolen information encompasses all inputs into OpenAI’s AI tools, including prompts fed to ChatGPT, user account details, payment information, data from users’ browsers, chat and search data, keystroke data, and more.

Microsoft, an OpenAI partner mentioned in the lawsuit, declined to comment, while OpenAI has yet to respond to CBS MoneyWatch’s request for comment.

The plaintiffs claim that OpenAI rushed its products to market without adequate safeguards, creating potential harm to users. The suit raises concerns about the tools’ immense power, which could lead to risks for humanity and even the ability to replicate users’ voices and likenesses.

The lawsuit demands transparency from OpenAI regarding the data it collects and seeks compensation for the stolen data on which the products rely. Additionally, the plaintiffs are advocating for the option for users to opt out of data collection when using OpenAI’s tools.

Blunder Of Bard

Google’s recently unveiled AI chatbot, Bard, had encountered a rough start when its initial demonstration showcased a factual error. Positioned as a competitor to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Bard was set to be made more widely accessible in the following weeks. During the demo, a query about the James Webb Space Telescope’s recent discoveries prompted Bard to respond with three bullet points, one of which incorrectly claimed that the telescope had captured “the very first pictures of a planet outside of our own solar system.” This assertion drew criticism from notable astronomers, who pointed out that the first exoplanet image was taken in 2004 and not by the James Webb Space Telescope.

Astrophysicist Grant Tremblay acknowledged the impressive capabilities of AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Bard but highlighted their tendency to confidently present erroneous information. These systems rely on vast amounts of text data to identify word patterns, lacking a direct database of verified facts. Consequently, they may unintentionally “hallucinate” and produce false data, leading some experts to dub them as “bullshit generators.”

Conclusion

However, the competition between ChatGPT and Bard will undoubtedly stimulate innovation and drive the AI language model landscape forward. Both AI giants, OpenAI and Google, continue to push the boundaries of natural language processing, benefiting users and businesses alike.

In the coming years, we can expect fascinating developments and breakthroughs in AI-driven language models, further transforming how we interact with technology and enriching our digital experiences. If you want to learn more about the field of AI, join our workshop today!